<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01206nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">374020</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">374020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20090901u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">"Mind the Gap", progress towards developing anti-fraud culture strategies in UK central government bodies</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Mark Button, Graham Brooks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">* (CD 132).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Partindo do trabalho desenvolvido pelo "HM Treasury" no Reino Unido, os articulistas prop&#xF5;em-se verificar a exten&#xE7;&#xE3;o e qualidade das culturas e estrat&#xE9;gias anti-fraude implementadas pelos &#xF3;rg&#xE3;os centrais governamentais. Utiliza-se os dados quantitativos recolhidos pelo "HM Treasury", compara-se com os dados qualitativos obtidos pela an&#xE1;lise dos autores. Constata-se que um n&#xFA;mero significativo de organismos p&#xFA;blicos possui limitada cultura estrat&#xE9;gica anti-fraude.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Bingley</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2009</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 16, n&#xBA; 3</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Journal of Financial Crime</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1359-0790</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 229-244</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CORRUP&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FRAUDE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BUTTON</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Mark</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BROOKS</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Graham</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_30351_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">401801</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ30351</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
