<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00861nam a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">373922</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">373922</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20090518u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O rigor t&#xE9;cnico</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Fernando Almeida</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">(*).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O autor, partindo da considera&#xE7;&#xE3;o de que a regra do trabalho t&#xE9;cnico deve ser a m&#xE1;xima exactid&#xE3;o, faz uma an&#xE1;lise &#xE0;s inexactid&#xF5;es das designa&#xE7;&#xF5;es dos calibres das armas de fogo ("calibre real" e "calibre nominal") e das muni&#xE7;&#xF5;es para armas de fogo de cano estriado.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Maio-Junho 2009</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Ano 5, n.&#xBA; 33</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Armas e Muni&#xE7;&#xF5;es</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 52-55</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARMAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARMA DE FOGO E MUNI&#xC7;&#xD5;ES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BAL&#xCD;STICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ALMEIDA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Fernando </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_30041_000000000000000_</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">401703</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ30041 ()</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
