<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01752nam a2200253   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">373484</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">373484</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20080225u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Regulating prostitution</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">social inclusion, responsibilization and the politics of prostitution reform</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Jane Scoular, Maggie O'Neill</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Resumo inserto no pr&#xF3;prio artigo.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Following Matthews (2005) recent examination of prostitution's changing regulatory framework, we offer a critical account of the move from 'enforcement' (punishment) to 'multi-agency' (regulatory) responses as, in part, a consequence of new forms of governance. We focus on the increasing salience of exiting - a move favoured by Matthews as signalling a renewed welfare approach, but one which, when viewed in the wider context of 'progressive governance', offers insight into new labour's attempt to increase social control under the rhetoric of inclusion, through techniques of risk and responsibilization. By exploring the moral and political components of these techniques, we demonstrate how they operate to privilege and exclude certain forms of citizenship, augmenting the on-going hegemonic moral and political regulation of sex workers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Oxford</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">September 2007</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">Vol. 47, n. 5</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">British Journal of Criminology (The)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0007-0955</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 764-778</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROSTITUI&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SAN&#xC7;&#xC3;O PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEGISLA&#xC7;&#xC3;O PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INCLUS&#xC3;O SOCIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">METODOLOGIAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SCOULAR</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Jane</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O'NEILL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Maggie</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_28573_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">401265</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ28573</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
