01736nam a2200205   4500001000700000090001100007100004100018101000800059200014000067311004000207330096500247461010201212606003001314606002201344606002001366606001601386700002101402701001901423995008801442373449  a373449  a20080117u           y0pory50      ba  aeng  aShaming, shame and recidivismea test of reintegrative shaming theory in the white-collar crime contextfKristina Murphy, Nathan Harris  aResumo inserto no próprio artigo.  aDespite the popularity of reintegrative shaming theory in the field of criminology, only a small number of studies purporting to test in have been published to date. The aim of the present study, therefore, is to provide an empirical test of Braithwaite's (1989; Braithwaite and Braithwaite 2001) theory of reintegrative shaming in the white-collar crime context. The data on which the study is based came from survey data collected from a group of 652 tax offenders. Consistent with predictions, it found that feelings of reintegration/stigmatization experienced during an enforcement experience had been reintegrative in nature were less likely to report having evaded their taxes two years later. Consistent with Braithwaite and Braithwaite's (2001) hypotheses, shame-related emotions were also found to partially mediate the effect of reintegration on subsequent offending behaviour. Implications for the effective regulation of white-collar are discussed.  cOxforddNovember 2007vVol. 47, n. 6tBritish Journal of Criminology (The)x0007-0955pp. 900-917  aCRIME DE COLARINHO BRANCO  aFRAUDE FINANCEIRA  aESTUDO DE CASOS  aAUSTRÁLIA  aMURPHYbKristina  aHARRISbNathan  104PJ_28392_00000000000000052022-06-069401230aPJcPJkPJ28392n2022-06-06o0rAP