01433nam a2200205   4500001000700000100004100007101000800048200010500056311004000161330076200201461009700963606002201060606002301082606002401105606002401129606001701153606001601170700001801186701002301204373427  a20080107u           y0pory50      ba  aeng  aReinventing preventionewhy did 'crime prevention' develop so late?fPat O'Malley, Steven Hutchinson  aResumo inserto no próprio artigo.  aWhile crime prevention is taken to exemplify governance in the 'risk society', it may represent a retarded example of risk-based urban security. Crime prevention was unaffected by risk-based prevention characteristic of much nineteenth-century government of this domain. The development of risk-based fire prevention, by contrast, was substantially in place at the turn of the twentieth century, promoted by the convergence of insurance and other interests in securing property. Rather than seeing crime prevention as exemplifying the move toward the "risk society" it may be better understood as a case in which neo-liberal governance and insurance technologies transformed a domain of governance that had been unusually resistant to risk-based approaches.  cOxforddMay 2007vVol. 47, n. 3tBritish Journal of Criminology (The)x0007-0955pp. 373-389  aSOCIEDADE E CRIME  aSEGURANÇA URBANA  aPOLÍTICA CRIMINAL  aPOLÍTICA POLICIAL  aMETODOLOGIAS  aREINO UNIDO  aO'MALLEYbPat  aHUTCHINSONbSteven