<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01017nam a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">372935</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">372935</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20061213u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reformas na justi&#xE7;a e crescimento econ&#xF3;mico em Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Jos&#xE9; Tavares</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Resumo inserto no pr&#xF3;prio artigo.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Desenvolve-se, neste artigo, um ensaio sobre o impacto de potenciais reformas da justi&#xE7;a no crescimento econ&#xF3;mico. Os resultados desse estudo revelam que a introdu&#xE7;&#xE3;o de reformas institucionais traduzir-se-ia em taxas de crescimento econ&#xF3;mico bastante mais elevadas, e que, entre as reformas mais promissoras, uma maioria est&#xE1; associada ao sistema legal.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Janeiro-Mar&#xE7;o 2006</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">N. 34</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Sub Judice - Justi&#xE7;a e Sociedade</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0872-2137</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 119-126</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SISTEMA DE JUSTI&#xC7;A PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TAVARES</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Jos&#xE9;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PJ_27562_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">400716</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PJ27562</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
