<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01846nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">371607</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">371607</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20040220u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The discovery process and personal file information</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Richard G. Schott</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dispon&#xED;vel em: https://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2003/nov2003/nov03leb.htm#page_26</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ressalta-se a import&#xE2;ncia de os funcion&#xE1;rios de pol&#xED;cia n&#xE3;o reterem intencionalmente informa&#xE7;&#xF5;es, quer pessoais, quer respeitantes a outr&#xE9;m, quando intervenientes em investiga&#xE7;&#xF5;es, ou na qualidade de testemunhas, sob pena de distorcerem os factos e alterarem as decis&#xF5;es do tribunal. &#xC9; atrav&#xE9;s da "due process clause", que a 4&#xAA; e a 5&#xAA; Emendas da Constitui&#xE7;&#xE3;o dos EUA, prev&#xEA;m que todo o arguido tenha direito a um julgamento justo, sendo a preval&#xEA;ncia da verdade assegurada pelo respectivo sistema de justi&#xE7;a penal. Uma das formas de os tribunais procurarem a verdade, &#xE9; atrav&#xE9;s do designado "pretrial discovery", fase em que a acusa&#xE7;&#xE3;o e a defesa revelam entre si determinadas provas que pretendem usar em tribunal, com vista ao apuramento da verdade. &#xC9; neste contexto e atrav&#xE9;s de exemplos concretos, que se observa at&#xE9; que ponto os funcion&#xE1;rios de pol&#xED;cia que intencionalmente ret&#xEA;m informa&#xE7;&#xF5;es, privam os arguidos de acederem ao direito ao "due process" que a Constitui&#xE7;&#xE3;o lhes concede.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">p.25-32</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">November 2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.11,n.72</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">FBI-Law Enforcement Bulletin</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0014-5688</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Washington</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INFORMA&#xC7;&#xC3;O CRIMINAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INVESTIGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O CRIMINAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITOS DO ARGUIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ESTADOS UNIDOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SCHOTT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Richard G.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">399388</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
