<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01288nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">371266</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">371266</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20030519u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Should officers be armed?</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Mike Waldren</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Os confrontos ocorridos com funcion&#xE1;rios de pol&#xED;cia, que se tornaram mortais para estes, levaram mais uma vez o Reino Unido ao debate pol&#xE9;mico sobre o uso de armas por parte daqueles funcion&#xE1;rios. Saber se estes devem andar armados ou n&#xE3;o, &#xE9; uma quest&#xE3;o que n&#xE3;o obteve ainda o consenso geral. No artigo exp&#xF5;em-se algumas opini&#xF5;es em que o sim e o n&#xE3;o se confrontam. A favor do sim figura uma selec&#xE7;&#xE3;o de artigos constitu&#xED;dos por cartas de leitores enviadas &#xE0; "Police Review". Com opini&#xE3;o contr&#xE1;ria, figuram os argumentos do pr&#xF3;prio autor do artigo, um ex-dirigente da "Met's Firearms Unit", de Londres.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9 May 2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.111,n.5723</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Police Review</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0309-1414</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.32-33</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARMA DE FOGO E MUNI&#xC7;&#xD5;ES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UTILIZA&#xC7;&#xC3;O DE ARMA DE FOGO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ACTUA&#xC7;&#xC3;O POLICIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DEFESA PESSOAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">WALDREN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Mike</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">399047</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
