<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00923nam a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">371169</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">371169</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20030321u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sex crimes</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">James Morton</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">As leis inglesas que regulamentam os delitos sexuais, t&#xEA;m-se revelado controversas, discriminat&#xF3;rias e ineficazes. Ao justificar tais opini&#xF5;es, o articulista passa em revista esta legisla&#xE7;&#xE3;o e chama a aten&#xE7;&#xE3;o para as "anomalias" que a proposta de lei "Sexual Offenses Bill" ir&#xE1; provocar, caso venha a ser aprovada.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">14 February 2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.111, n.5711</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Police Review</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0309-1414</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.30-31</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CRIME SEXUAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEGISLA&#xC7;&#xC3;O PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MORTON</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">James</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">398950</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
