<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01966nam a2200277   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">370057</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">370057</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20020418u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Religious programs and prison</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">an exploratory study</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Byron R. Johnson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="311" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dispon&#xED;vel em: https://www.cjcenter.org/cjcenter/publications/cji/archives/cji.php?id=64Acedido em 13 de Abril de 2007.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Apresentam-se os resultados de um estudo explorat&#xF3;rio destinado a observar, por compara&#xE7;&#xE3;o, o comportamento e o grau de reincid&#xEA;ncia, caso se verifique, de reclusos libertados de 2 estabelecimentos prisionais brasileiros, respectivamente o estabelecimento prisional de Humaita e o estabelecimento prisional de Bragan&#xE7;a. O estudo observa o comportamento dos reclusos no per&#xED;odo dos tr&#xEA;s anos subsequentes &#xE0; sua liberta&#xE7;&#xE3;o. Tendo os dois estabelecimentos prisionais adoptado pol&#xED;ticas prisionais diferentes, uma de vertente religiosa, assegurada por volunt&#xE1;rios, a outra, recorrendo ao trabalho prisional em empresas exteriores ao estabelecimento prisional, com vista a uma posterior reinser&#xE7;&#xE3;o social, pretendeu-se observar at&#xE9; que ponto os respectivos comportamentos e a reincid&#xEA;ncia se manifestavam de maneira diferente, por forma a determinar qual destes dois modelos prisionais indicava uma maior propens&#xE3;o para reduzir a reincid&#xEA;ncia.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Chicago</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">April 2002</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V. 18, n. 61</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Crime and Justice International</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1096-8733</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p. 9-10; 31</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PRESO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">POL&#xCD;TICA PRISIONAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REINSER&#xC7;&#xC3;O SOCIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BRASIL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ESTABELECIMENTO PRISIONAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JOHNSON</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Byron R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">397838</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
