<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00876nam a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">369897</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">369897</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20020205u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Uma dificuldade da identifica&#xE7;&#xE3;o dactilosc&#xF3;pica</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Pinto da Costa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Refere-se uma per&#xED;cia na qual uma das impress&#xF5;es digitais era negativa da outra. Tal facto, observado uma &#xFA;nica vez no Instituto de Medicina Legal do Porto, resultou da tinta, que inicialmente fora deitada em demasia nos dedos, ter sido retirada das cristas, por meio de pano, permanecendo nos sulcos.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Porto</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">V.1,n.2</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Boletim de Medicina Legal e Toxicologia Forense</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.185-190</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MEDICINA LEGAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DACTILOSCOPIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COSTA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Pinto da</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">397678</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
