<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01160nam a2200241   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">369462</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">369462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20010606u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Passes de futebol</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Isabel Reis Figueira</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Recentemente um clube portugu&#xEA;s de futebol recorreu de uma decis&#xE3;o proferida por um juiz de primeira inst&#xE2;ncia, na qual estava em causa o arresto de 3 passes de jogadores de futebol, como uma forma de pagamento da d&#xED;vida desse mesmo clube. O artigo foca a quest&#xE3;o do arresto e a sua aplicabilidade em termos legais, e destaca a import&#xE2;ncia de car&#xE1;cter econ&#xF3;mico dos passes para os clubes de futebol.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Mar&#xE7;o/Maio 2001</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">N.2</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Direito em Revista</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">1.11</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JURISPRUD&#xCA;NCIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SUPREMO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTI&#xC7;A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FUTEBOL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIGUEIRA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Isabel Reis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">397243</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-06-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
