<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>013300000a22002650004500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">340408</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">340408</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20220318              pory50        </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Liability for negligent investigation : the osman legacy</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Philip Palmer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This article considers the liability of the police for negligent investigation. It argues that police's traditional immunity from negligence has been eroded following recent decisions by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.Two decisions, &#x201C;Osman vs UK&#x201D; and &#x201C;Menson vs UK&#x201D; have had a significant impact upon the liability of the police service with regard to their duties to safeguard life and conduct an efficient investigation. This article focuses on these two important cases and the impact they have had on the developing the law of police liability for negligent investigation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">The Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigation. - Vol.2, issue2 (autumn 2006),p.33-40</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INVESTIGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O CRIMINAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JURISPRUD&#xCA;NCIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ACTUA&#xC7;&#xC3;O POLICIAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Palmer, Philip</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="920" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">n</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="921" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">a</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="935" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">k</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="936" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="937" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="938" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">IPJCCPP__11126_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">368145</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">IPJCC</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">IPJCCPP.11126</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
