<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>008610000a22002170004500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">331531</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">331531</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20220318              pory50        </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A talha nos concelhos de Miranda do Douro, Mogadouro e Vimioso nos s&#xE9;culos XVII e XVIII</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Ant&#xF3;nio Rodrigues Jr.Mourinho</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Braga </subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1984</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">AMPM </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">286 p. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">il. </subfield>
    <subfield code="d">24 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="310" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">oferta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Com a visita aos concelhos de Miranda do Douro, Mogadouro e Vimioso, foi feito um estudo sobre ret&#xE1;bulos de talha, sendo considerados os de Miranda do Douro como mais ricos. Este trabalho deu origem a um invent&#xE1;rio, destas obras, composto por 100 exemplar.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OBRA DE ARTE</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">304694</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mourinho, Ant&#xF3;nio Rodrigues Jr.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">321600</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="920" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">n</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="921" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">a</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">IPJCCICE_100_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2022-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">IPJCC5710</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">357087</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">PJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">IPJCC</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">IPJCC CID57101619</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">IPJCCICE100</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2022-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
