<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02001nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">32279</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9789726290599</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">32279</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20171120d2016       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O novo c&#xF3;digo de prcesso civil e o processo do trabalho</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">coordena&#xE7;&#xE3;o [de] Maria do Ros&#xE1;rio Palma Ramalho, Teresa Coelho Moreira</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lisboa</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">AAFDL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">207p.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">23 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="225" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Estudos APODIT</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nota pr&#xE9;via. Tem o direito processual do trabalho princ&#xED;pios pr&#xF3;prios? / Maria do Ros&#xE1;rio Palma Ramalho. Incid&#xEA;ncias do novo C&#xF3;digo de Processo Civil no processo do trabalho em especial no processo declarativo comum / Pedro Madeira de Brito. Implica&#xE7;&#xF5;es do c&#xF3;digo de processo civil de 2013 nos procedimentos cautelares laborais: em especial, a invers&#xE3;o do contencioso / Isabel Alexandre. Procedimentos cautelares laborais e a articula&#xE7;&#xE3;o com o novo c&#xF3;digo de processo civil: em especial, a invers&#xE3;o do contencioso / Marco Carvalho Gon&#xE7;alves. A a&#xE7;&#xE3;o especial de impugna&#xE7;&#xE3;o judicial da regularidade e licitude do despedimento: um balan&#xE7;o jurisprudencial da sua aplica&#xE7;&#xE3;o / Filipe Fra&#xFA;sto da Silva. Processos emergentes de acidente de trabalho &#xE9; necess&#xE1;rio rever a tramita&#xE7;&#xE3;o? / Albertina Aveiro Pereira. As a&#xE7;&#xF5;es para a impugna&#xE7;&#xE3;o da confidencialidade, tutela da personalidade do trabalhador e da igualdade e n&#xE3;o discrimina&#xE7;&#xE3;o em fun&#xE7;&#xE3;o do sexo / David Carvalho Martins. As perplexidades geradas pela a&#xE7;&#xE3;o especial de reconhecimento da exist&#xEA;ncia de contrato de trabalho / Viriato Reis. Recursos no processo do trabalho: justifica-se um regime especial? / Ant&#xF3;nio Santos Abrantes Geraldes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">118180</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO PROCESSUAL DO TRABALHO</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">118871</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">IMPUGNA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">21561</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RECURSO</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">209843</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O NOVO C&#xD3;DIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL E O PROCESSO DO TRABALHO</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24541</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">347.91/.95RAM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">347_910000000000000__95RAM</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">4855</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">36318</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGPJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGPJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">DGPJ4855433272</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">347.91/.95RAM</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">compra</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
