<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01605nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">31468</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9090187529</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">31468</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20120709d2004       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mapping restorative justice</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">developments in 25 europen countries</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">David Miers, Jolien Willemsens [ed. lit.]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Leuven</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice v.z.w</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">195p.</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">24cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fundo documental do GRAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A. Structure : A.1 Objectives A.2 Method A.3 Organisation of review. B. Descriptions of each jurisdiction's provision : B.1. Full accounts of 17 jurisdictions : 1. Austria. 2. Belgium. 3. Czech Republic. 4. Denmark. 5. England and wales. 6. Finland. 7. France. 8. Germany. 9. Italy. 10. Luxembourg. 11. Netherlands. 12. Norway. 13. Poland. 14. Portugal. 15. Slovenia. 16. Spain. 17. Sweden. B.2. Short accounts of 8 jurisdictions : 1. Albania. 2. Bulagaria. 3. Hungary. 4. Iceland. 5. Ireland. 6. Moldova. 7. Scotland. 8. Ukraine. C. Analysis : C.1. Being cautions about comparative study C.2. Programme characteristics of 17 jurisdictions. D. Discussion : D.1. Intervention models D.2. Programme evaluation D.3. Convergence. Appendices : 1. Final list of countries and contributors. 2. Analysis by them. 3. Bibliography.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MEDIA&#xC7;&#xC3;O V&#xCD;TIMA-AGRESSOR</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">21345</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ORGANIZA&#xC7;&#xC3;O JUDICI&#xC1;RIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">228</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">VITIMOLOGIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">722</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MAPPING RESTORATIVE JUSTICE. DEVELOPMENTS IN 25 COUNTRIES</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24179</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">J.RES_MAP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">J__RES_MAP</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="6">371GRAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">35420</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGPJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGPJ</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">DGPJ371GRAL375649</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">J.RES_MAP</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">MO</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
