<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01612nam a2200241   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">25690</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">25690</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20210202c2014       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O exame neurol&#xF3;gico P300 em tribunal e a (in)viabilidade da sua utiliza&#xE7;&#xE3;o no processo penal portugu&#xEA;s</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Marta Madalena Botelho</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O presente artigo aborda o exame neurol&#xF3;gico abreviadamente designado P300 e as suas potencialidades para a descoberta da verdade material no &#xE2;mbito processual penal. O tema reveste-se de particular relevo ap&#xF3;s a sua utiliza&#xE7;&#xE3;o, pela primeira vez, num processo em fase de inqu&#xE9;rito em Espanha, em Dezembro de 2013, estando, actualmente, pendente no Tribunal Constitucional daquele pa&#xED;s um recurso de amparo da decis&#xE3;o que confirmou o despacho que determinou a realiza&#xE7;&#xE3;o do exame. Antecipa-se a enuncia&#xE7;&#xE3;o das principais implica&#xE7;&#xF5;es que poder&#xE1; vir a ter a sua admissibilidade no processo penal portugu&#xEA;s, no que respeita aos direitos fundamentais do arguido e nas garantias de defesa, com enfoque nas decorrentes do princ&#xED;pio da n&#xE3;o auto-incrimina&#xE7;&#xE3;o (nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">A.24, n.1</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">jan.-mar.2014</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.57-86</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Portuguesa de Ci&#xEA;ncia Criminal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO DE DEFESA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MEM&#xD3;RIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROVA PER&#xCD;CIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DEFESA DO ARGUIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO AO SIL&#xCA;NCIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PORTUGAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BOTELHO</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Marta Madalena Botelho</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">PP143</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PP_143_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">29019</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PP143</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
