<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01744nam a2200277   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">24516</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">24516</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20131105c2011       y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O reenvio prejudicial de urg&#xEA;ncia no contexto do espa&#xE7;o de liberdade</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">seguran&#xE7;a e justi&#xE7;a</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Teresa Bravo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Neste artigo abordam-se as caracter&#xED;sticas e a tramita&#xE7;&#xE3;o do reenvio prejudicial de urg&#xEA;ncia, no contexto do Tratado de Lisboa, bem como a sua import&#xE2;ncia no &#xE2;mbito dos mecanismos de tutela jurisdicional e assinalam-se semelhan&#xE7;as e diferen&#xE7;as relativamente ao reenvio prejudicial ordin&#xE1;rio. Esta an&#xE1;lise &#xE9; ilustrada com recurso a dois casos (os ac&#xF3;rd&#xE3;os Inga Rinau e Sebastian Coecochea) apreciados pelo TJUE, nos quais o &#xF3;rg&#xE3;o judicial europeu fez uso daquele mecanismo processual e explicitou os contornos do conceito de "urg&#xEA;ncia". A parte final debru&#xE7;a-se sobre o papel assumido pelos particulares nesta "nova" forma de contencioso, questionando-se at&#xE9; que ponto ele representa uma mais valia efectiva na defesa dos direitos dos cidad&#xE3;os europeus.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">A.21,n.3</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Jul.-Set. 2011</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.355-394</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Portuguesa de Ci&#xEA;ncia Criminal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO COMUNIT&#xC1;RIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REENVIO PREJUDICIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LIBERDADE E SEGURAN&#xC7;A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ACESSO &#xC0; JUSTI&#xC7;A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PORTUGAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BRAVO</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Teresa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">PP143</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">PP_143_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">27845</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">PP143</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
