<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01542nam a2200229   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">24506</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">24506</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20130923u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A revoga&#xE7;&#xE3;o de actos administrativos entre o Direito nacional e a jurisprud&#xEA;ncia da Uni&#xE3;o Europeia</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">um instituto a dois tempos</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Carla Amado Gomes, Rui Tavares Lanceiro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">O presente artigo versa sobre a rela&#xE7;&#xE3;o entre o tempo e a revoga&#xE7;&#xE3;o do acto administrativo e divide-se em duas partes: i) uma an&#xE1;lise cr&#xED;tica do actual regime da revoga&#xE7;&#xE3;o &#xE0; luz do CPA; e ii) uma releitura desse regime &#xE0; luz do Direito da UE. Come&#xE7;a por se fazer uma leitura cr&#xED;tica do regime consagrado no CPA, tendo nomeadamente em conta a sua rela&#xE7;&#xE3;o com o regime de impugna&#xE7;&#xE3;o contenciosa dos actos administrativos, de onde resultam pistas para a sua reintrepeta&#xE7;&#xE3;o e para a sua altera&#xE7;&#xE3;o futura. Numa segunda fase, s&#xE3;o analisados os condicionamentos resultantes  do Direito da UE relativamente ao regime de revoga&#xE7;&#xE3;o, tendo em conta os limites da autonomia procedimental nacional.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">A.33,N.132</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Out.-Dez. 2012</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">11-69</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista do Minist&#xE9;rio P&#xFA;blico</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Lisboa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ACTO ADMINISTRATIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">IMPUGNA&#xC7;&#xC3;O </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">REVOGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JURISPRUDENCIA COMUNIT&#xC1;RIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="702" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GOMES</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Carla Amado</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">o outro </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LANCEIRO</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Rui Tavares</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.25</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__25_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">27835</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.25</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
