<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01723nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">21129</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">21129</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20080219u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hacia una nueva regulaci&#xF3;n de la prescripci&#xF3;n en los delitos contra la administraci&#xF3;n p&#xFA;blica</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">un debate de actualidad</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In this article one will assess the legitimacy and the purpose of the periods of prescription (extensions of the criminal statute of limitations) to commence proceedings and also the ongoing periods of prescription reformation  proposals within the fight against corruption taking place in several jurisdictions. By analysing the mechanics underlying this legal concept, one will recall that there are circumstances (e.g. the suspension of the statute of limitations) which serve as checks and balances within the system, provided that these are all constrained, thus enabling one to reinstate the system's fairness. By increasing legal time, by disregarding periods of prescription (imprescriptibility) or causing its eternal delay one does not achieve any forestalling of the effects of time. As Dal&#xED;'s imagery and Proust's prose demonstrate, time is no forgiver. Without the legal concept the applicability of the criminal statute of limitations, State power will simply turn out to be aggression once more.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">A.8,n.14</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2007</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.139-180</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Themis</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DELITO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ADMINISTRA&#xC7;&#xC3;O P&#xDA;BLICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONCURSO DE INFRAC&#xC7;&#xD5;ES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BURGOA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Elena</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.279</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__279_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24458</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.279</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
