<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01537nam a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">20903</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20903</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20070606u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Com&#xE9;rcio electr&#xF3;nico e protec&#xE7;&#xE3;o dos consumidores</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The subject of the present article is the protection of consumers in electronic contracts. This article does not intend to be a comprehensive analysis of all the questions involved but a mere appraisal of some of the most interesting aspects. The analysis of the protection of consumers in electronic commerce takes into account, not only the rules implementing the Directive on electronic commerce, but also the rules derived from the Directive for the protection of consumers in distance contracts. In this article we conclude that, under Portuguese law, the service provider intending to enter into distance contracts is obliged to make a (public) offer, the acceptance of which, by the consumer, leads to the immediate conclusion of the contract. Nevertheless, the effects of the contract are only produced after the consumer sends to the service provider a confirmation of the contract.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">A.7,n.13</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2006</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.41-62</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Themis</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Coimbra</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COM&#xC9;RCIO ELECTR&#xD3;NICO </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROTEC&#xC7;&#xC3;O SOCIAL </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONSUMIDOR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONTRATO INFORM&#xC1;TICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CARVALHO</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Jorge Morais</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.279</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__279_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24232</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.279</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
