<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01165nam a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">20734</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20734</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20070209u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Knowledge production and the punishment ethic</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">the demise of the probation service</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In the past decade the probation service has experienced significant change. A new &#xAB;knowledge&#xBB; has emerged, known as &#xAB;what works&#xBB;, which aims to use the &#xAB;best available evidence-base&#xBB; for planning and implementing effective interventions with offenders. Simultaneously, there has been an embracing of &#xAB;punishment&#xBB;, as opposed to &#xAB;welfarism&#xBB;, as the appropriate milieu of the probation service. When deconstructed these two features share some common elements, within which a hegemonic masculinist approach to crime control and offender management can be discerned.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">V.53,n.4</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Dec. 2006</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.317-333</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Probation Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROBATION SERVICE  G&#xC9;NERO  PUNI&#xC7;&#xC3;O  TECNOLOGIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FARRANT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Finola</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__105_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">24063</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.105</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
