<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01099nam a2200181   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">19614</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">19614</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20041108u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Societal security, refugees and criminology</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">discourses in tandem</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This article seeks to apply mainstream criminalogical discourses to refugee policy, using Australia's refugee policy as a case study. Notions of security, ethnicity, race, social exclusion and xenophobia are all well established within various criminological discourses. This article aims to show that the use of similar discourses in both the criminological and refugee spheres is increasingly prevalent and helps to justify restrictive refugee practices within the context of societal security.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">V,51,n.3</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">sep. 2004</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.197-205</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Probation Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AUSTR&#xC1;LIA  DISCURSO CRIMINOL&#xD3;GICO  IMIGRA&#xC7;&#xC3;O  REFUGIADO  SEGURAN&#xC7;A  SOCIEDADE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">KING</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Jackie</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__105_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22943</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.105</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
