<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00969nam a2200205   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">18854</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">18854</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20030114u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Targeting and treatment? do prolific offender projects have a future?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Anne Worrall, Leigh Dunkerton and Vivian Leacock discuss a variety of issues relating to the operation of prolific offender projects, with particular reference to the Newcastle-under-Lyme scheme. They focus in particular on the nature of multi-agency relationships, and the complexity of notions of "effectiveness" and success in relation to such projects.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">V.49,n.4</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Dec. 2002</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.287-296</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Probation Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROJECTOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">WORRALL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Anne </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DUNKERTON</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Leigh </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="701" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEACOCK</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Vivian</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__105_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22183</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.105</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
