<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01282nam a2200169   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">14882</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">14882</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20010326u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Spiderman comes to salford tagging affenders</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">cynical resignation or pragmatic acceptance?</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Steve Collett</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Home Secretary has made it clear that the enhancement of public credibility in community sentences is a crucial prerequisite if the Probation Service is to successfully divert more offenders from custody. Steve Collett draws on the experience of Greater Manchester Probation Service's involvement in the tagging pilot to argue the nature of the response to electronic monitoring could be a crucial factor both in the development of sentencer and public confidence in the Probation Service, and, by extension, in the future of the Probation Service itself. Steve Collett is an Honorary Fellow, Departement of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Liverpool University, and an Assistant Chief Probation Officer in Greater Manchester.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">V.45,n.1</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">March 1998</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.3-9</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Probation Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONTROLO ELETR&#xD3;NICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COLLETT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Steve</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__105_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">18211</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.105</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
