<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="https://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00968nam a2200169   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">14752</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">14752</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20010326u           y0pory50      ba</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="101" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="200" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The qualification of probation officcers</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">thoughts for the future</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Nigel Elliot</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="330" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nigel Elliot, Probation Officer in the South East London Probation Service and formerly a Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Croydon College, takes a critical look at recent proposals for the development of a new qualifying structure for probation officers. He identifies some of the obstacles to be navigated in achieving the right balance between the NVQ, external validation and an award at higher education level.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="461" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">V.44,n.4</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Dec.1997</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">p.205-210</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Probation Journal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROBATION OFFICER  HABILITA&#xC7;&#xC3;O LITER&#xC1;RIA  FORMA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ELLIOT</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Nigel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="j">P.105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="995" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">P__105_000000000000000</subfield>
    <subfield code="5">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">18081</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DGRSP</subfield>
    <subfield code="k">P.105</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2021-12-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">AP</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
