02153nam a2200325 450000100060000001000180000609000100002410000410003410100080007520001430008320500190022621000450024521500300029022500410032030001260036133008860048760600330137360600230140660600300142960600270145960600360148660600170152270000250153970100300156470100230159470100330161771000380165085200130168899501260170110010 a9781909521513 a10010 a20170322d2015 y0pory50 ba aeng aBalancing security and dignity in prisonsea framework for preventive monitoringfAndrea Huber...[et.al.]gorg. Penal Reform International aSecond edition aLondoncPenal Reform Internationald2015 a21 p.cil.ddigitalizado  aA detention monitoring tool resource aConsultado em 22 de março de 2017 https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/security-dignity-2nd-ed-v6.pdf aIn many countries, whether driven by political or media pressure for tighter security, a punitive approach to imprisonment, inadequate staff-prisoner ratios or a lack of training on inter-personal skills, de-escalation and mediation, prison management often takes unnecessary or disproportionate recourse to security measures in violation of detainees’ right to dignity.This paper aims to provide an analytical framework for detention monitoring bodies, including National Preventive Mechanisms, to support them to:understand the concepts of dignity and security in prisons and the relationship between themidentify situations where there is a particular risk that security is overemphasised to the detriment of the dignity of prisoners. These include: over-classification of prisoners, body searches, instruments of restraint, solitary confinement, and staff-prisoner relations. aDIREITO PENITENCIÁRIO9549 aVIGILÂNCIA96397 aPREVENÇÃO GERAL95472 aDIREITOS HUMANOS93523 aREGRAS DE NELSON MANDELA910939 aTORTURA9746 aHUBERbAndrea910948 aBERNATHbBarbara 9105625 aALLENbRob 910971 aDELAPLACEbEdouard 9105626 aPENAL REFORM INTERNATIONAL910937 j343.8HUB 104343_000000000000000_8HUB52021-12-1768110913129aDGRSPcDGRSPfDGRSP81101049276k343.8HUBn2021-12-17o0rMOxoferta