01921nam a2200301   450000100060000001000180000610000410002410100080006520001430007320500190021621000450023521500300028022500410031030001260035133008860047760600280136360600170139160600240140860600210143260600290145360600120148270000180149470100220151270100160153470100250155071000310157585200130160610010  a9781909521513  a20170322d2015       y0pory50      ba  aeng  aBalancing security and dignity in prisonsea framework for preventive monitoringfAndrea Huber...[et.al.]gorg. Penal Reform International  aSecond edition  aLondoncPenal Reform Internationald2015  a21 p.cil.ddigitalizado   aA detention monitoring tool resource  aConsultado em 22 de março de 2017 https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/security-dignity-2nd-ed-v6.pdf  aIn many countries, whether driven by political or media pressure for tighter security, a punitive approach to imprisonment, inadequate staff-prisoner ratios or a lack of training on inter-personal skills, de-escalation and mediation, prison management often takes unnecessary or disproportionate recourse to security measures in violation of detainees’ right to dignity.This paper aims to provide an analytical framework for detention monitoring bodies, including National Preventive Mechanisms, to support them to:understand the concepts of dignity and security in prisons and the relationship between themidentify situations where there is a particular risk that security is overemphasised to the detriment of the dignity of prisoners. These include: over-classification of prisoners, body searches, instruments of restraint, solitary confinement, and staff-prisoner relations.  aDIREITO PENITENCIÁRIO  aVIGILÂNCIA  aPREVENÇÃO GERAL  aDIREITOS HUMANOS  aREGRAS DE NELSON MANDELA  aTORTURA  aHUBERbAndrea  aBERNATHbBarbara   aALLENbRob   aDELAPLACEbEdouard    aPENAL REFORM INTERNATIONAL  j343.8HUB