A devassa das comunicações entre o advogado e o cliente preso : as escutas do caso Gürtel / Adriana Rodrigues Tenreira ; ori.tese Inês Ferreira Leite
Idioma: Português.País: Portugal.Publicação: Lisboa : Faculdade de Direito, 2020Descrição física: 90 p.; 30 cmColeção: EstudosNota de dissertação ou tese: Dissertação realizada no âmbito do Mestrado em Direito e Prática Jurídica –Especialidade de Ciências Jurídico-ForensesAssunto: 220 | 895 | 529 | 6491 | 268714 | 11375 | 1200 | 330771 | 5079CDU: 343.2 Localização e Cota : EST1294 Resumo: This dissertation is based on the analysis of the audio listen bugging case of Gürtel, in which the judge Baltasar Garzón, while investigating a case regarding economic and financial crimes from an outlaw organization, ordered the bugging of conversations taken place in prison between the lawyer and the accused. He did so in order to understand if the defendants were maintaining the criminal organisation even after being arrested. This would only be possible if the defendant’s lawyers were condoning it. The judge’s action may have compromised the constitutional rights of de defendants, valid to all citizens, and consequently the Democratic State of Law, thus revealing that those who are in charge of the jurisdictional enforcement power are not applying the law in an impartial and rightful way.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monografias | Biblioteca da Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais | EST1294 (Browse shelf) | 9767 | Available | DGRSP9767 |
Dissertação realizada no âmbito do Mestrado em Direito e Prática Jurídica –Especialidade de Ciências Jurídico-Forenses
This dissertation is based on the analysis of the audio listen bugging case of Gürtel, in
which the judge Baltasar Garzón, while investigating a case regarding economic and
financial crimes from an outlaw organization, ordered the bugging of conversations taken
place in prison between the lawyer and the accused. He did so in order to understand if
the defendants were maintaining the criminal organisation even after being arrested. This
would only be possible if the defendant’s lawyers were condoning it. The judge’s action
may have compromised the constitutional rights of de defendants, valid to all citizens,
and consequently the Democratic State of Law, thus revealing that those who are in
charge of the jurisdictional enforcement power are not applying the law in an impartial
and rightful way.
There are no comments for this item.