Forensic science in criminal courts [Recurso eletrónico] : ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods : report to the President
Autor institucional: ESTADOS UNIDOS. PCAST Working GroupIdioma: Inglês.Publicação: Washington, D.C. : Executive Office of the President. President’s Council of Advisors onScience and Technology (PCAST), 2016Descrição física: 1 CD-ROM; 12 cmAssunto: 321508 | 343233 | 305225 | 341295 | 334103Resumo: The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. PCAST Working Group. Senior Advisors. Table of Contents. Executive Summary: 1. Introduction; 2. Previous Work on Validity of Forensic-Science Methods; 3. The Role of Scientific Validity in the Courts; 4. Scientific Criteria for Validity and Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods; 5. Evaluation of Scientific Validity for Seven Feature-Comparison Methods. Conclusion.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monografias | Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária | PJCD299 (Browse shelf) | PJCD299 | Available | PJ1CD299_18 |
Relatório do estudo realizado pelo PCAST dirigido ao Presidente Barack Obama. Ficheiro de 1,77 MB em formato PDF (160 p.).
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. PCAST Working Group. Senior Advisors. Table of Contents. Executive Summary: 1. Introduction; 2. Previous Work on Validity of Forensic-Science Methods; 3. The Role of Scientific Validity in the Courts; 4. Scientific Criteria for Validity and Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods; 5. Evaluation of Scientific Validity for Seven Feature-Comparison Methods. Conclusion.
There are no comments for this item.