Facial identification guidance [Recurso eletrónico]
Autor institucional: REINO UNIDO. National Policing Improvement AgencyIdioma: Inglês.Publicação: London : NPIA ; ACPO, 2009Descrição física: 1 CD-ROM; 12 cmAssunto: 1233 | 343105 | 328354 | 344767 | 321508 | 334328Resumo: Preface. Section 1 – Glossary of terms. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Composite likeness. 1.3 Recall and recognition. 1.4 Facial imaging officer. 1.5 Composite artist. 1.6 Forensic artist. 1.7 Cognitive interview. Section 2 – Facial imaging techniques. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Computerised facial imaging. 2.1.2 Artist composite. 2.1.3 Computerised or artist’s impression. 2.1.4 Post-mortem interpretation. 2.1.5 Facial reconstruction. 2.1.5.1 Two-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.2 Three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.3 Computerised three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.6 Age progression of children.2.1.7 Image comparison. 2.1.7.1 Techniques. 2.1.7.2 Practitioner background and experience. 2.1.8 Morphing. 2.1.8.1 Methods. 2.1.8.2 Practitioner background and experience. Section 3 – Training. 3.1 Minimum standards. 3.1.1 Facial imaging officers and composite image artists. 3.1.2 Forensic artists. Section 4 – Working practices. 4.1. Exhibits. 4.1.1. Production of original exhibits. 4.1.2 Production of secondary exhibits. 4.2. Disclosure. 4.2.1 Material. 4.2.2 Retention of material. 4.3 Multiple images. 4.4 Security videos and stills. 4.5 Intelliqence circulation. 4.6 Authority to circulate composite images to the media. Section 5 – Witness considerations. 5.1 Video recording the facial composite process. 5.2 Witness availability. 5.3 Witness ability to provide a composite image. 5.3.1 Recall or composite methods. 5.3.2 Recognition or holistic methods. 5.3.3 Use of features. 5.3.4 Witness support. 5.4 Witness contamination. 5.5 Operator contamination. Section 6 – Legal framework. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Case law. 6.2.1 R v Virag (1969) and R v Dougherty (1973). 6.2.2 R v Percy Smith (1976) Crim LR 511. 6.3 Summary. Appendix 1 – Criteria required for submission for post-mortem interpretation. Appendix 2 – Criteria required for submission for facial reconstruction. Appendix 3 – Criteria for submission for facial image comparison. Appendix 4 –Criteria for production of a morphed composite. Appendix 5 – Further reading.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monografias | Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária | PJCD184 (Browse shelf) | PJCD184 | Available | PJ1CD184_11 |
Produced [by NPIA] on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Ficheiro de 1,64 Mb em formato pdf (45 p.). Disponível em: https://npia.police.uk/en/docs/Facial_ID.pdf. Acedido em 18 de Janeiro de 2012.
Preface. Section 1 – Glossary of terms. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Composite likeness. 1.3 Recall and recognition. 1.4 Facial imaging officer. 1.5 Composite artist. 1.6 Forensic artist. 1.7 Cognitive interview. Section 2 – Facial imaging techniques. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Computerised facial imaging. 2.1.2 Artist composite. 2.1.3 Computerised or artist’s impression. 2.1.4 Post-mortem interpretation. 2.1.5 Facial reconstruction. 2.1.5.1 Two-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.2 Three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.5.3 Computerised three-dimensional reconstruction. 2.1.6 Age progression of children.2.1.7 Image comparison. 2.1.7.1 Techniques. 2.1.7.2 Practitioner background and experience. 2.1.8 Morphing. 2.1.8.1 Methods. 2.1.8.2 Practitioner background and experience. Section 3 – Training. 3.1 Minimum standards. 3.1.1 Facial imaging officers and composite image artists. 3.1.2 Forensic artists. Section 4 – Working practices. 4.1. Exhibits. 4.1.1. Production of original exhibits. 4.1.2 Production of secondary exhibits. 4.2. Disclosure. 4.2.1 Material. 4.2.2 Retention of material. 4.3 Multiple images. 4.4 Security videos and stills. 4.5 Intelliqence circulation. 4.6 Authority to circulate composite images to the media. Section 5 – Witness considerations. 5.1 Video recording the facial composite process. 5.2 Witness availability. 5.3 Witness ability to provide a composite image. 5.3.1 Recall or composite methods. 5.3.2 Recognition or holistic methods. 5.3.3 Use of features. 5.3.4 Witness support. 5.4 Witness contamination. 5.5 Operator contamination. Section 6 – Legal framework. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Case law. 6.2.1 R v Virag (1969) and R v Dougherty (1973). 6.2.2 R v Percy Smith (1976) Crim LR 511. 6.3 Summary. Appendix 1 – Criteria required for submission for post-mortem interpretation. Appendix 2 – Criteria required for submission for facial reconstruction. Appendix 3 – Criteria for submission for facial image comparison. Appendix 4 –Criteria for production of a morphed composite. Appendix 5 – Further reading.
There are no comments for this item.