Survey of gunshot residue prevalence on the hands of individuals from various population groups in and outside Europe / Amalia Stamoulia ...[et al.]
In: Forensic Chemistry.ISSN 2468-1709. Vol. 23 (May 2021) , 8 p. Idioma: Inglês.Assunto: ARMA DE FOGO E MUNIÇÕES | ANÁLISE DE VESTÍGIOS | POLÍCIA CIENTÍFICA | ANÁLISE LABORATORIAL | ESTUDO DE CASOS Resumo: 1.Introduction. 2. Data and materials. 2.1. Sampling. 2.2. Information related to sampled persons. 2.3. Analysing stubs with SEM/EDS. 2.4. Data check and harmonisation. 2.5. Statistical evaluation. 2.6. Laboratory effects and differences between subgroups. 2.7. Participating forensic laboratories. 3. Results. 3.1. Notation. 3.2. Descriptive statistical analysis. 4. Inferential statistical analysis 4.1. Identification of outliers. 4.2. Laboratory effects and differences between subgroups. 4.3. Applying the subgroup effect model to the low and high-risk groups. 4.4. Influence of relationship to firearms. 4.5. Influence of handling a firearm within 5 h prior to sampling. 5. Discussion 5.1. Car mechanics. 5.2. Presence of PbBaSb particles on people with and without a relationship with firearms. 5.3. Presence of PbBaSb particles in police population. 5.4. Handling a firearm. 5.5. Variability of results. 6.Conclusions.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analíticos de Periódicos | Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária | PJCD 316 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Participantes do estudo: Amalia Stamoulia, Ludwig Niewöhner, Magnus Larsson, Bertrand Colson, Steffen Uhligd, Lubor Fojtasek, Fatima Machado, Lawrence Gunaratnam.
1.Introduction. 2. Data and materials. 2.1. Sampling. 2.2. Information related to sampled persons. 2.3. Analysing stubs with SEM/EDS. 2.4. Data check and harmonisation. 2.5. Statistical evaluation. 2.6. Laboratory effects and differences between subgroups. 2.7. Participating forensic laboratories. 3. Results. 3.1. Notation. 3.2. Descriptive statistical analysis. 4. Inferential statistical analysis 4.1. Identification of outliers. 4.2. Laboratory effects and differences between subgroups. 4.3. Applying the subgroup effect model to the low and high-risk groups. 4.4. Influence of relationship to firearms. 4.5. Influence of handling a firearm within 5 h prior to sampling. 5. Discussion 5.1. Car mechanics. 5.2. Presence of PbBaSb particles on people with and without a relationship with firearms. 5.3. Presence of PbBaSb particles in police population. 5.4. Handling a firearm. 5.5. Variability of results. 6.Conclusions.
There are no comments for this item.