Eliciting human intelligence (Record no. 395500)

001 - ETIQUETA DE REGISTO
Identificador do registo 395500
010 ## - NÚMERO INTERNACIONAL NORMALIZADO DOS LIVROS (ISBN)
Número (ISBN) 9789162896959
100 ## - DADOS GERAIS DE PROCESSAMENTO
Dados gerais de processamento 20190614d2016 y0pory50 ba
101 ## - LÍNGUA DA PUBLICAÇÃO
Língua do texto, banda sonora, etc. Inglês
200 ## - TÍTULO E MENÇÃO DE RESPONSABILIDADE
Título próprio Eliciting human intelligence
Indicação genérica do tipo de material Recurso eletrónico
Informação de outro título a conceptualization and empirical testing of the Scharff technique
Primeira menção de responsabilidade Simon Oleszkiewicz
210 ## - PUBLICAÇÃO, DISTRIBUIÇÃO, ETC.
Lugar da publicação, distribuição, etc. Gothenburg
Nome do editor, distribuidor, etc. Ineko
Data da publicação, distribuição, etc. 2016
215 ## - DESCRIÇÃO FÍSICA
Indicação específica do tipo de material e extensão do item 1 CD-ROM
Dimensões 12 cm
300 ## - NOTAS GERAIS
Texto da nota Doctoral dissertation in Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, February 2016. Resumo inserto na publicação. Ficheiro de 730 KB em formato PDF (89 p.).
330 ## - SÚMULA OU RESUMO
Texto da nota This thesis is on how to elicit intelligence from human sources with the principal aim being to examine the efficacy of the tactics employed by the renowned WWII interrogator Hanns Scharff. A novel experimental set-up (as well as new dependent measures) was introduced to evaluate the efficacy of different human intelligence gathering techniques. Participants were given information about a planned terrorist attack, asked to take on the role of “sources”, and instructed to be semi-cooperative in a subsequent interview. In Study I (N = 60), interviews were conducted over the phone. The Scharff technique (conceptualized to include five tactics) was compared to the direct approach (a combination of open-ended and specific questions). The Scharff technique resulted in relatively more new information and led sources to underestimate how much new information they revealed. With the Direct Approach, sources overestimated how much new information they revealed. In Study II (N = 119), interacting parties met face-to-face and the sources were allowed to lie. Two versions of the Scharff technique were compared to the direct approach. The Scharff confirmation technique made use of claims that included the correct alternative while the Scharff disconfirmation/confirmation technique made use of a mix of correct and incorrect claims. The Scharff confirmation technique resulted in more new information than the Scharff disconfirmation/confirmation technique and the direct approach. Sources interviewed using the Scharff techniques had a more difficult time reading the interviewer’s information objectives and underestimated their contribution of new information. Sources interviewed using the direct approach overestimated how much new information they revealed. In Study III (N = 200) the interview techniques were used with four different types of sources varying in both their levels of cooperation and capability to provide information as follows: (a) less willing/less able, (b) less willing/more able, (c) more willing, less able, and (d) more willing/more able. The Scharff technique was compared to the direct approach. Overall, the Scharff technique resulted in relatively more new information, particularly when interviewing less cooperative sources. Furthermore, sources interviewed using the Scharff technique had a more difficult time reading the interviewer’s information objectives and consistently underestimated their contribution of new information. This thesis provides a psychological framework for and a conceptualization of the Scharff technique. Furthermore, the thesis introduces an experimental set-up mirroring a human intelligence interaction and offers a new set of dependent measures for mapping the efficacy of intelligence gathering techniques. In sum, this thesis provides support for the Scharff technique as an effective tool for eliciting information from human sources.
606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO
Elemento de entrada TÉCNICAS DE ENTREVISTA
ID Autoridade 326570
606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO
Elemento de entrada ENTREVISTA PSICOLÓGICA
ID Autoridade 102928
606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO
Elemento de entrada INFORMAÇÃO CRIMINAL
ID Autoridade 321297
606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO
Elemento de entrada METODOLOGIAS
ID Autoridade 341295
606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO
Elemento de entrada TESE
ID Autoridade 334284
700 ## - NOME DE PESSOA - RESPONSABILIDADE PRINCIPAL
Palavra de ordem OLESZKIEWICZ
Outra parte do nome não tomada para palavra de ordem Simon
ID Autoridade 358958
955 ## -
-- Oferta
995 ## - LOCALIZAÇÃO E INFORMAÇÃO DE EXEMPLARES
-- 0
-- PJCD_302_000000000000000
-- 2022-06-06
-- 2022-06-06
-- 0
Holdings
Número de registo Número interno Koha (auto-gerado) Biblioteca de aquisição Biblioteca de empréstimo Código de barras Cota Tipo de documento Forma de aquisição
PJCD302 428416 Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária Biblioteca da Polícia Judiciária PJ1CD302_6 PJCD302 Monografias Oferta