| 001 - ETIQUETA DE REGISTO |
|---|
| Identificador do registo |
393480 |
| 100 ## - DADOS GERAIS DE PROCESSAMENTO |
|---|
| Dados gerais de processamento |
20150925d2015 y0pory50 ba |
| 101 ## - LÍNGUA DA PUBLICAÇÃO |
|---|
| Língua do texto, banda sonora, etc. |
Inglês |
| 200 ## - TÍTULO E MENÇÃO DE RESPONSABILIDADE |
|---|
| Título próprio |
National anti-corruption strategies |
| Indicação genérica do tipo de material |
Recurso eletrónico |
| Informação de outro título |
a practical guide for development and implementation |
| 210 ## - PUBLICAÇÃO, DISTRIBUIÇÃO, ETC. |
|---|
| Lugar da publicação, distribuição, etc. |
Vienna |
| Nome do editor, distribuidor, etc. |
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) |
| Data da publicação, distribuição, etc. |
2015 |
| 215 ## - DESCRIÇÃO FÍSICA |
|---|
| Indicação específica do tipo de material e extensão do item |
1 CD-ROM |
| Dimensões |
12 cm |
| 300 ## - NOTAS GERAIS |
|---|
| Texto da nota |
Ficheiro de 468 KB em formato PDF (68 p.). |
| 330 ## - SÚMULA OU RESUMO |
|---|
| Texto da nota |
Acknowledgements. I. Drafting process. A. Assign responsibility for drafting the strategy to a small, semi-autonomous group. B. Ensure the continued support and involvement of senior political leaders. C. Consult regularly with all government agencies that will be affected by the strategy. D. Solicit the views of the political opposition whenever possible. E. Engage all sectors of society in the drafting process. F. Emphasize communication, transparency and outreach throughout the drafting process. G. Allocate sufficient time and resources to drafting the strategy. H. Take advantage of other countries’ experience and expertise. II. Preliminary diagnosis and situation analysis. A. Conduct a preliminary diagnosis of corruption challenges. 1. Self-assessments, peer reviews and other assessments. 2. Cross-country comparisons of corruption or governance. 3. Country-specific surveys of corruption perceptions. 4. Surveys of actual experience with corruption. 5. Internet platforms and social media. 6. Information collected by government agencies. 7. Comparisons of different data sources. 8. Vulnerability assessments. 9. Proxy measurements. B. Assess obstacles to effective reform. 1. Evaluate resource constraints. 2. Address potential opposition and support . III. Formulating anti-corruption measures. A. Tailor the strategy to the diagnosis, taking account of constraints. B. Be ambitious but realistic. C. Identify concrete, specific measures to be taken. D. Describe the objective of each reform element. E. Consider the costs, benefits, burdens, opposition and support for each element.. F. Pay attention to prioritization and sequencing. G. Specify implementation times for different reforms. IV. Ensuring effective implementation. A. Put a single, high-level entity in charge of coordination and implementation. B. Provide the coordination and implementation body with sufficient authority. C. Foster cooperation between the coordination body and the implementing agencies. D. Harness the power of reputation. E. Have each agency agree to an implementation, monitoring and evaluation schedule. F. Do not underestimate the challenges of coordinating implementation. V. Monitoring, evaluating and reporting. A Monitoring and evaluating implementation. 1. Disaggregate policy reforms into discrete steps. 2. Select one or more indicators of progress. 3. Choose a baseline for each indicator . 4. Establish realistic targets for each implementation indicator. 5. Watch for indicator manipulation. 6. Be cautious when using agency self-evaluations. 7. Utilize evaluations to adjust implementation targets and strategy goals. 8. Allocate sufficient time and adequate resources for evaluation. B. Monitoring and evaluating impact. 1. Do not use year-to-year changes in corruption index scores to measure strategic impact . 2. Select impact indicators that can be compared over time. 3. Isolate the impact of the policies implemented pursuant to the strategy. 4. Be sensitive to the cost and time required. 5. Involve civil society organizations, scholars, research organizations and citizens. 6. Provide methods for ongoing revision to the strategy. C. Public reporting of results of monitoring and evaluation. 1. Internal reporting as part of coordination mechanisms, ensuring the accountability of the implementation process. 2. Reporting to higher authorities in the executive or parliament . 3. Public reporting ensures transparency in the implementation of the national strategy. Annex. Kuala Lumpur statement on anti-corruption strategies. |
| 606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO |
|---|
| Elemento de entrada |
POLÍTICA CRIMINAL |
| ID Autoridade |
231088 |
| 606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO |
|---|
| Elemento de entrada |
CORRUPÇÃO |
| ID Autoridade |
229145 |
| 606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO |
|---|
| Elemento de entrada |
CRIME ECONÓMICO |
| ID Autoridade |
238882 |
| 606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO |
|---|
| Elemento de entrada |
GUIA DE INFORMAÇÃO |
| ID Autoridade |
1233 |
| 606 ## - NOME COMUM USADO COMO ASSUNTO |
|---|
| Elemento de entrada |
CONVENÇÃO |
| ID Autoridade |
331653 |
| 710 ## - NOME DE COLECTIVIDADE - RESPONSABILIDADE PRINCIPAL |
|---|
| Palavra de ordem |
NAÇÕES UNIDAS |
| Subdivisão |
Office on Drugs and Crime |
| ID Autoridade |
320900 |
| 955 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
Oferta |
| 995 ## - LOCALIZAÇÃO E INFORMAÇÃO DE EXEMPLARES |
|---|
| -- |
0 |
| -- |
PJCD_268_000000000000000 |
| -- |
2022-06-06 |
| -- |
2022-06-06 |
| -- |
0 |
